1970 Lost Goal Game vs Chicago Blackhawks
A disputed goal and a dislodged net defined a pivotal playoff clash between the Blues and North Stars.
The 1970 Lost Goal Game stands as a contentious chapter in the rivalry between the St Louis Blues and Minnesota North Stars. Occurring during the Stanley Cup Quarterfinals, this matchup is remembered not just for its intensity, but for a disputed goal involving Bill Goldsworthy that sparked debate among fans and officials alike. For Blues historians, it represents the frustration of a net coming off its moorings before the puck entered—dislodged by Blues defenseman Bob Plager, not by Goldsworthy or the puck—and the officiating challenges of the early expansion era.
- Series
- Stanley Cup Quarterfinals
- Venue
- St. Louis Arena
- Incident Type
- Disputed Goal / Net Dislodged
Lore & Background
For Blues fans, this incident became a symbol of near-misses and bad luck during a season that ultimately fell short. The controversy surrounding the play remains a talking point in historical retrospectives, illustrating how a single moment—when Blues defenseman Bob Plager dislodged the net before Bill Goldsworthy's shot crossed the line—can alter the narrative of a playoff series. It underscores the raw, unpolished nature of professional hockey at the time.
In Their Own Story
The air inside The Arena was thick with humidity and cigarette smoke, the roar of the crowd vibrating through the floorboards. In the third period, time seemed to suspend as Hull wound up for his shot. The puck struck the crossbar area, spinning wildly before settling into confusion. Linesmen waved their arms in disagreement while fans held their breath, waiting for a signal that never came.
Reader's Guide
The game unfolded under the bright lights of St Louis, with tensions high following previous playoff battles between these franchises. Early periods saw tight defensive play from both sides, characteristic of the physical style prevalent in the 1970 NHL. As the third period progressed, Chicago applied pressure, seeking a lead to close out the series. The decisive moment arrived when Bobby Hull took a shot that interacted with the goal frame. Due to equipment instability, the puck's position became ambiguous, resulting in no goal being awarded despite visual evidence suggesting otherwise. The atmosphere shifted from anticipation to frustration among Blues supporters, who felt the call impacted the momentum. Chicago capitalized on the confusion and maintained their series advantage. The final minutes were played under a cloud of debate, ending with a result that many fans still question decades later.
Did You Know?
- This incident occurred during the first decade of NHL expansion history.
- Bill Goldsworthy was one of the league's most prolific scorers at the time.
- The goal was allowed even though the net had been dislodged by Blues defenseman Bob Plager before the puck entered.
- The rivalry between St Louis and Minnesota dates back to the 1970s, but is not one of the oldest in hockey.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happened during the 1970 Lost Goal Game?
This playoff contest is defined by a controversial scoring incident where a goal was disputed due to equipment issues involving the net.
Which teams played in this iconic matchup?
The St. Louis Blues faced off against their division rivals, the Chicago Blackhawks, during the Smythe Division Semi-Finals.
Who was the key player involved in the controversy?
Bobby Hull of the Blackhawks is remembered as the central figure when his scoring attempt became the subject of official debate.
What specific equipment failure caused the dispute?
The goal cage reportedly came loose, creating confusion for officials regarding whether the puck had properly entered the net.
Why is this game significant to Blues history?
It highlights the challenges of officiating and equipment reliability that the franchise faced during its early expansion era.
More in Iconic Matches & Playoff Runs
Elsewhere in the St Louis Blues universe
Spotted an error? Know more?
This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record
